Case study · Peer reviewed

Two peer-reviewed studies, 2,572 first-year students, and a measured link between engagement and grades.

Northeastern UniversityBoston, Massachusetts

northeastern university logo
By the numbers
2,572

First-year students who used the platform, 53 percent of the eligible class

PEER REVIEWED Werntz et al. 2026, International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education. 4,832 eligible first-year students.
725

Students who used the platform for at least three months

PEER REVIEWED Werntz et al. 2026. In this group, more messaging was associated with stronger belonging, academic self-efficacy and well-being. More check-ins were associated with academic self-efficacy and well-being, but not significantly with belonging.
2

Peer-reviewed studies published on the program

PEER REVIEWED Werntz et al. 2023, Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science. Werntz et al. 2026, International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education.

Northeastern made app-supported peer mentoring available to every incoming first-year student and studied what happened over two years. Two peer-reviewed papers came out of it. More check-ins and more messages to peer mentors were both associated with higher end-of-year grade point averages, after controlling for prior academic risk. Both studies are observational, so they establish association rather than cause. More messaging was also associated with more course withdrawals.

Peer mentoring at Northeastern University.
Program facts
Organization
Northeastern University
Segment
Higher education, large private research university
Population
All incoming first-year undergraduates, opt-in
Model
Trained and paid peer mentors using goal setting, weekly check-ins and secure messaging, with referrals to campus services
Measurement window
Two academic years, 2021-22 and the following year
Comparison group
Propensity score matching on gender, age, first-generation status, underrepresented minority status and high school GPA
Analysis
Independent peer review. Werntz, Jasman, Simeon, Gunasekaran, Yowell and Rhodes (2023). Werntz, Deng, Jasman, Yowell and Rhodes (2026).
Note
The platform is named MentorHub in the first paper and MentorPRO in the second. It is the same system.
I think this is probably the most helpful program our school has ever come out with.
Juliana Gesztesi, Peer Mentor, Northeastern University

See MentorPRO built around your program.

Tell us a little about your program and a member of our partner success team will reach out.